The problem with saying your a pragmatic X is X becomes meaningless, your just pragmatic 98% of the time. It's only the 'meaningless' edge cases where you revert to whatever X is. See: How the 'communist party' deals with the Chinese economy.
PS: For a US example compare how law enforcement deals with impoverished areas vs wealthy areas in the same state.
> PS: For a US example compare how law enforcement deals with impoverished areas vs wealthy areas in the same state.
I see this pattern in actual experience:
"PS: For a US example compare how law enforcement deals with [crime-ridden, lack-of-self-control-prone] areas vs [peaceful, quiet, classy] areas in the same state."
Comments
The problem with saying your a pragmatic X is X becomes meaningless, your just pragmatic 98% of the time. It's only the 'meaningless' edge cases where you revert to whatever X is. See: How the 'communist party' deals with the Chinese economy.
PS: For a US example compare how law enforcement deals with impoverished areas vs wealthy areas in the same state.
> PS: For a US example compare how law enforcement deals with impoverished areas vs wealthy areas in the same state.
I see this pattern in actual experience:
"PS: For a US example compare how law enforcement deals with [crime-ridden, lack-of-self-control-prone] areas vs [peaceful, quiet, classy] areas in the same state."