The alternate take is that the ceiling is proving to be lower than originally hoped, and that one team of startup folk are looking to squeeze out a business model that satisfies their original investors and the other team of passionate researchers are ready to go find their next bold research opportunities elsewhere.
passionate researchers are ready to go find their next bold research opportunities elsewhere
Not supported by Ilya agreeing with board to fire Sam Altman.
I also think you'll struggle to find a majority of people thinking AI research's "ceiling is proving to be lower than originally hoped", what with 4o, SORA, GPT5 all coming and it's only been 1.5 years since ChatGPT.
Most folks who are part of the startup, don't care to stick around for the scale. Different phases of the company tend to attract different types of people.
Comments
The alternate take is that the ceiling is proving to be lower than originally hoped, and that one team of startup folk are looking to squeeze out a business model that satisfies their original investors and the other team of passionate researchers are ready to go find their next bold research opportunities elsewhere.
Not supported by Ilya agreeing with board to fire Sam Altman.
I also think you'll struggle to find a majority of people thinking AI research's "ceiling is proving to be lower than originally hoped", what with 4o, SORA, GPT5 all coming and it's only been 1.5 years since ChatGPT.
I like this take best. :)
Most folks who are part of the startup, don't care to stick around for the scale. Different phases of the company tend to attract different types of people.