Skip to content

Comment on Libyearparent

Comments

I guessed the same thing but didn't even notice it was unclear, I just assumed my guess was probably right ...

The concept really does seem obvious, especially since it sounds like man year, but it needs better documentation.

What confused me was saying that some version of Rails is some number of libyears behind some other version, when in order to know that you'd need to expect the dependencies of Rails itself...

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.