"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
Not to say that the people working at FB are stupid, but odds are that someone at FB made this page several years ago and this page has languished on the backburner with no attention since then.
I don't think this page wasn't updated for long time. It has IE logo of IE9+. So it was updated at least after IE9 release and by that time Chrome was major browser.
Comments
"Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
Not to say that the people working at FB are stupid, but odds are that someone at FB made this page several years ago and this page has languished on the backburner with no attention since then.
I don't think this page wasn't updated for long time. It has IE logo of IE9+. So it was updated at least after IE9 release and by that time Chrome was major browser.
IE9 was released April Last year.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Explorer_8
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Explorer_9
Good point. Still, I argue that FB doesn't have any sort of ulterior motive with not showing a webkit-based browser or what-have-you.
On the grounds that they are stupid?
Actually the old page (well, one version of it) didn't list IE at all.