Comment on Apple/OpenELM: Efficient Open-Source Family Language ModelsparentComments−orra2yI retract the claim of proprietary. I misunderstood some of the licence wording. The license appears to be well accepted as a permissive open source license. https://spdx.org/licenses/AML.html−vulcan012yYep, AML is basically MIT + some stuff about patents. One wonders why they do not use the Apache license instead.
Comments
I retract the claim of proprietary. I misunderstood some of the licence wording. The license appears to be well accepted as a permissive open source license. https://spdx.org/licenses/AML.html
Yep, AML is basically MIT + some stuff about patents. One wonders why they do not use the Apache license instead.