It's not common, no offense but you clearly have an axe to grind and started out with an incomplete understanding, so [citation needed].
Also, please do name and shame, especially since MICROSOFT MANDATES THAT SECURE BOOT IS DISABLE-ABLE (on x86 devices, anyway, we'll see what happens with Snapdragon X Elite devices).
1. The comment doesn't respond to any claims I made.
2. The comment doesn't do the bare minimum to back up their claims, after spouting already wrong information in this thread. (Sorry, not sorry, but if you're going to complain a device is non-compliant with MS's own SecureBoot requirements, it's really shouldn't be unexpected that someone might ask you to specify which device.)
3. Their comment is pithy, non-responsive, and doesn't advance the conversation in any meaningful way.
And mine is the one that gets modded?
EDIT: Also, a 22-hour old thread, with a reply getting flagged in <10 minutes. Hmmmmmmmmmm, wonder what that means.
Comments
It's not common, no offense but you clearly have an axe to grind and started out with an incomplete understanding, so [citation needed].
Also, please do name and shame, especially since MICROSOFT MANDATES THAT SECURE BOOT IS DISABLE-ABLE (on x86 devices, anyway, we'll see what happens with Snapdragon X Elite devices).
let's agree that real surveys of real equipment, with names and model numbers, are a "thing" .. yes
LOL mods.
1. The comment doesn't respond to any claims I made.
2. The comment doesn't do the bare minimum to back up their claims, after spouting already wrong information in this thread. (Sorry, not sorry, but if you're going to complain a device is non-compliant with MS's own SecureBoot requirements, it's really shouldn't be unexpected that someone might ask you to specify which device.)
3. Their comment is pithy, non-responsive, and doesn't advance the conversation in any meaningful way.
And mine is the one that gets modded?
EDIT: Also, a 22-hour old thread, with a reply getting flagged in <10 minutes. Hmmmmmmmmmm, wonder what that means.