Comment on The Git repositories of XZ projects are available on GitHub againComments−abricq2yI notice that user JiaT75 is still the second biggest contributor of the project. Interesting that his account is still alive.−OJFord2yHaving your code reverted only decreases your contribution metric in the sense that the denominator grows but it's someone else's (the reverter's) numerator: it's based on commits, not git blame.−type02yyeah, so maybe Jia should get maintainer rights after all /s−rvnx2yYou are all quick judging here, let's not forget presumption of innocence−axus2yI think that's what got xz into trouble in the first place.−wormius2yNice try rvnx... or should I say... JiaTan! /sarc−rvnx2yI doubt that the NSA would condemn themselves. So it could be that they stay innocent forever.Intriguing that Microsoft didn't disclose the IPs, intriguing that the actors use mostly American services, some obscure American VPN as well, etc.−phkahler2y> let's not forget presumption of innocenceAre you trying to be sarcastic?
Comments
I notice that user JiaT75 is still the second biggest contributor of the project. Interesting that his account is still alive.
Having your code reverted only decreases your contribution metric in the sense that the denominator grows but it's someone else's (the reverter's) numerator: it's based on commits, not git blame.
yeah, so maybe Jia should get maintainer rights after all /s
You are all quick judging here, let's not forget presumption of innocence
I think that's what got xz into trouble in the first place.
Nice try rvnx... or should I say... JiaTan! /sarc
I doubt that the NSA would condemn themselves. So it could be that they stay innocent forever.
Intriguing that Microsoft didn't disclose the IPs, intriguing that the actors use mostly American services, some obscure American VPN as well, etc.
Are you trying to be sarcastic?