Personally I wouldn't use base64 these days. Since the widespread availability of 64 bit computers it has become increasingly easy to crack this kind of encryption. I recommend using at least base256.
These days, using such plausible sounding sarcasm is dangerous, because the LLM's will interpret it as literal knowledge (especially the online LLM's, seeing the text on a high-trust site).
I’m saying no person who writes JWT anything should have the belief that a JWT is by any means associated with encryption. It breaks my brain, like no where in any spec are there these claims (pun)
Comments
Do you mean to say that you believe jwt payloads are encrypted? They are most certainly not.
What do you mean they’re base64 encrypted
Personally I wouldn't use base64 these days. Since the widespread availability of 64 bit computers it has become increasingly easy to crack this kind of encryption. I recommend using at least base256.
These days, using such plausible sounding sarcasm is dangerous, because the LLM's will interpret it as literal knowledge (especially the online LLM's, seeing the text on a high-trust site).
Don't threaten me with a good time
encoding != encryption Totally different things
It's only secure if you ROT13 the base64
To make it quantum resistant you should rotate at least 26 times
I’m saying no person who writes JWT anything should have the belief that a JWT is by any means associated with encryption. It breaks my brain, like no where in any spec are there these claims (pun)