Skip to content

Comment on The Future of Computer Science (2018)

Comments

Anything that cannot be grasped by an individual, cannot be taught. This means the gains that are emergent, will eventually be lost.

Or maintained in a self-reinforcing or propagating system.

We study how people use political power and how the political system works, because there are persistent dynamics, good and bad, that we don’t see until we look.

Same with economics.

Same with biological life.

Conscious understanding is not required for implicit knowledge to emerge in a system and maintain itself

In the sense that we are not actually aware of the details of how our minds work, even we ourselves are full of implicit knowledge. Some of which we pass on by example, over and over, without conscious recognition

Conscious understanding is not required for implicit knowledge to emerge in a system and maintain itself

Isn't this what most people (incorrectly, imo) call "knowledge"? The idea that "we know this", when "we" is not a thing that can know, as knowing can only occur in an individual. Still the collective is able to manage itself, little cogs in a big machine.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.