Comment on The AMD tinybox is on hold until we can build and run the firmware on our GPUsComments−renewiltord2yFrequently people say on HN you should use AMD but looks like it's not going to work. I am glad to stick to straightforward Nvidia GPU / Epyc CPU stack. Don't want to innovate for this.−brucethemoose22yIt's not either or, you can use different vendors for different tasks.tinygrad isn't in the realm of production ready though, AFAIK.−fisf2yYes but the same could be said about rocm.−convolvatron2ythere is no room for innovation in high performance tensor evaluation, cost-performance, or usability. we're just done.−renewiltord2yThere is room, but if you are not working on building the framework, it's not worth building the framework. The time cost is high.
Comments
Frequently people say on HN you should use AMD but looks like it's not going to work. I am glad to stick to straightforward Nvidia GPU / Epyc CPU stack. Don't want to innovate for this.
It's not either or, you can use different vendors for different tasks.
tinygrad isn't in the realm of production ready though, AFAIK.
Yes but the same could be said about rocm.
there is no room for innovation in high performance tensor evaluation, cost-performance, or usability. we're just done.
There is room, but if you are not working on building the framework, it's not worth building the framework. The time cost is high.