India is sadly at the forefront of low-quality tech sweatshops and may have even pioneered the concept... but not to worry, with remote work I'm sure other countries will catch up eventually too!
They have to compete with India (because otherwise why would you go there instead of just going with India) so they have to justify it by offering at least a slightly higher quality bar to differentiate themselves from a market saturated by low-quality sweatshops. Personal experience, I don't (yet) get spam emails offering me dev services from Eastern Europe (or Thailand/Philippines for that matter) but I've had my fair share of "agencies" promising me the moon at cheap prices, with all signs pointing that the origin of those is India.
---
In McD's and ATT's case
The problem with large, non-IT "legacy" companies is less outsourcing itself (although outsourcing is a symptom of it) but that there is no healthy engineering culture. Nobody competent joins/stays there because if you're competent and actually want that skill to be rewarded you'll have much better options, so the only thing that remains is mediocrity.
Since you mentioned ATT, ask yourself why there is zero innovation coming out of the telco space? It is after all just bits and bytes (and with things like IMS/VoLTE more and more of it is bog standard IP and SIP). We've seen innovation in banking (see challenger banks in the UK), we've seen it in electric utilities (Octopus Energy in the UK has a healthy Python-focused engineering arm), yet for some reason nothing ever comes out of telcos beyond excuses to misbill people and coming up with ever-outlandish use-cases for 5G.
Personal experience, I don't (yet) get spam emails offering me dev services from Eastern Europe (or Thailand/Philippines for that matter) but I've had my fair share of "agencies" promising me the moon at cheap prices, with all signs pointing that the origin of those is India.
Personal experience does not give you the right to be prejudiced.
And ime EPAM and ELITEX have been equally as horrid as WITCH, yet I don't presume all East European programmers suck.
why there is zero innovation coming out of the telco space
Plenty of innovation happens. They were some of the earliest adopters of Cloud and K8s, and a number of features and products that CSPs like AWS, Azure, GCP, Alibaba, etc now sell were initially developed by telcos and then resold to the CSPs.
---------
I get it, you're a freelancer/contractor and you must be jaded due to competition, yet in all honesty you aren't any different than a drone at EPAM or TCS.
If you are going to be publicly prejudiced, at least have the decency to be anonymous and not directly link your professional information.
Nowadays, it seems like they're struggling with basic things like defending against social-engineered SIM swaps (even when the account has an explicit note about it) and not leaking data (not talking about the "contested" AT&T breach, but the fully admitted T-Mobile one for example)?
Outsourced sweatshops aren't meaningful competition for me - they have their customers and I have mine, and those rarely intersect. The sales pipeline and target market is completely different. My problem with them is more that they often manage to get government contracts (and thus get tax money) and then deliver no/subpar results.
---
At the end of the day it's clear we have a different view on these things so let's agree to disagree - my mistake is your opportunity. If you feel like prejudice against common outsourcing sweatshops is mistaken, you are welcome to exploit it (you can do so via the stock market, or by taking on locally-priced contracts, outsourcing them and pocketing the difference).
have the decency to be anonymous
I'm trying to share my experience and opinion, not fire cheap shots under the cover of a throwaway. If this means some people choose not to work with me, so be it. If I wanted to be a people-pleaser and never say anything remotely negative I'd instead join a big corp and only communicate through the PR department.
Because TCS, HCL, Wipro, Infosys, and some western companies also keeping outsourcing teams there (i.e. Atos) provide consistently below-absolute-zero quality that pushes and enforces bad stereotypes.
Because the real issue is not Indian people or their skills, but corporations that established a pattern of supplying people whose only skill is alleged knowledge of english language. The best thing I can say about those companies is that their IT sweatshops are better than starving, and those who learn anything seem to escape to better workplaces.
I have yet to meet as consistent (negative) quality signal as finding out the job has been outsourced to consulting company in India. I have worked with, well, low-quality coworkers (and betcha been one myself more than once) from many countries - but nowhere else there is such negative selection.
For comparison, there's no such correlation if the coworker is indian but working elsewhere.
The headquarters location doesn't really matter in the context of outsourcing. Was the work in question done in Chicago, India, or somewhere else?
Assuming racism isn't particularly useful without more context. Racism is an intent, simply saying the work was outsourced to India could be as benign as having incorrect information and absolutely doesn't say anything about the people of India themselves.
Fair enough, I think that falls into incorrect information then. I didn't make the original claim and wouldn't have assumed it was outsourced at all, I have no idea the inner dynamics of McDonald's engineering teams.
My point was simply that saying the work was outsourced to India isn't itself enough to make a very real claim that someone is racist.
Having incorrect information isn't racist, making an assumption that outsourced work went to India if that matches a person's experience with outsourced IT work ending up in India isn't racist, and saying the country to which work may have been outsourced to says absolutely nothing about the people there.
Comments
They didn't say "Work is getting outsourced" they said said "Work is getting outsourced to India"
India is sadly at the forefront of low-quality tech sweatshops and may have even pioneered the concept... but not to worry, with remote work I'm sure other countries will catch up eventually too!
So are Ukraine, Romania, and Poland.
In McD's and ATT's case (because you commented on that as well) - their platform and security teams are located at HQ in the Central Sales Zone
They have to compete with India (because otherwise why would you go there instead of just going with India) so they have to justify it by offering at least a slightly higher quality bar to differentiate themselves from a market saturated by low-quality sweatshops. Personal experience, I don't (yet) get spam emails offering me dev services from Eastern Europe (or Thailand/Philippines for that matter) but I've had my fair share of "agencies" promising me the moon at cheap prices, with all signs pointing that the origin of those is India.
---
The problem with large, non-IT "legacy" companies is less outsourcing itself (although outsourcing is a symptom of it) but that there is no healthy engineering culture. Nobody competent joins/stays there because if you're competent and actually want that skill to be rewarded you'll have much better options, so the only thing that remains is mediocrity.
Since you mentioned ATT, ask yourself why there is zero innovation coming out of the telco space? It is after all just bits and bytes (and with things like IMS/VoLTE more and more of it is bog standard IP and SIP). We've seen innovation in banking (see challenger banks in the UK), we've seen it in electric utilities (Octopus Energy in the UK has a healthy Python-focused engineering arm), yet for some reason nothing ever comes out of telcos beyond excuses to misbill people and coming up with ever-outlandish use-cases for 5G.
Personal experience does not give you the right to be prejudiced.
And ime EPAM and ELITEX have been equally as horrid as WITCH, yet I don't presume all East European programmers suck.
Plenty of innovation happens. They were some of the earliest adopters of Cloud and K8s, and a number of features and products that CSPs like AWS, Azure, GCP, Alibaba, etc now sell were initially developed by telcos and then resold to the CSPs.
---------
I get it, you're a freelancer/contractor and you must be jaded due to competition, yet in all honesty you aren't any different than a drone at EPAM or TCS.
If you are going to be publicly prejudiced, at least have the decency to be anonymous and not directly link your professional information.
It's a small industry
Over a decade ago, sure.
Nowadays, it seems like they're struggling with basic things like defending against social-engineered SIM swaps (even when the account has an explicit note about it) and not leaking data (not talking about the "contested" AT&T breach, but the fully admitted T-Mobile one for example)?
But don't take it from me, here's a more reliable source with way more experience in the field: https://berthub.eu/articles/posts/5g-elephant-in-the-room/
Outsourced sweatshops aren't meaningful competition for me - they have their customers and I have mine, and those rarely intersect. The sales pipeline and target market is completely different. My problem with them is more that they often manage to get government contracts (and thus get tax money) and then deliver no/subpar results.
---
At the end of the day it's clear we have a different view on these things so let's agree to disagree - my mistake is your opportunity. If you feel like prejudice against common outsourcing sweatshops is mistaken, you are welcome to exploit it (you can do so via the stock market, or by taking on locally-priced contracts, outsourcing them and pocketing the difference).
I'm trying to share my experience and opinion, not fire cheap shots under the cover of a throwaway. If this means some people choose not to work with me, so be it. If I wanted to be a people-pleaser and never say anything remotely negative I'd instead join a big corp and only communicate through the PR department.
Which is even more jarring as McD's platform team is in their Chicagoland office.
The amount of unbridled racism on HN is getting annoying.
We outsource to Israel, Poland, Romania, etc as well, yet no one is acting racist about them.
Because TCS, HCL, Wipro, Infosys, and some western companies also keeping outsourcing teams there (i.e. Atos) provide consistently below-absolute-zero quality that pushes and enforces bad stereotypes.
Because the real issue is not Indian people or their skills, but corporations that established a pattern of supplying people whose only skill is alleged knowledge of english language. The best thing I can say about those companies is that their IT sweatshops are better than starving, and those who learn anything seem to escape to better workplaces.
I have yet to meet as consistent (negative) quality signal as finding out the job has been outsourced to consulting company in India. I have worked with, well, low-quality coworkers (and betcha been one myself more than once) from many countries - but nowhere else there is such negative selection.
For comparison, there's no such correlation if the coworker is indian but working elsewhere.
Adding the country receiving the outsourced work doesn't change the rest of the sentence to mean those getting the work are to blame.
McD's Platform Team is at their HQ in Chicagoland.
At some point it is plain racism and prejudice.
The headquarters location doesn't really matter in the context of outsourcing. Was the work in question done in Chicago, India, or somewhere else?
Assuming racism isn't particularly useful without more context. Racism is an intent, simply saying the work was outsourced to India could be as benign as having incorrect information and absolutely doesn't say anything about the people of India themselves.
The work is done IN CHICAGOLAND!
I have managed and sold products or funded companies that have sold to the very same guys who do this stuff at McDs and insert_F1000_here
The fact you automatically assume "India" is sheer racism, as if all good programmers are only in the US and all bad ones in India.
Newsflash - all humans are kinda good and kinda bad.
Fair enough, I think that falls into incorrect information then. I didn't make the original claim and wouldn't have assumed it was outsourced at all, I have no idea the inner dynamics of McDonald's engineering teams.
My point was simply that saying the work was outsourced to India isn't itself enough to make a very real claim that someone is racist.
Having incorrect information isn't racist, making an assumption that outsourced work went to India if that matches a person's experience with outsourced IT work ending up in India isn't racist, and saying the country to which work may have been outsourced to says absolutely nothing about the people there.