Scary to see this censorship still goes on, even now, at this latter stage, where the studies on myocarditis are numerous and no longer debunked.
The censorship was even worse during the initial rollout of mRNA technology, blocking fair scrutiny of a widespread rollout.
Proper scientific scrutiny and debate is vital around novel technologies. Particularly novel MEDICAL technologies. And particularly where governments are mandating that the technology is administered to whole populations.
Comments
Scary to see this censorship still goes on, even now, at this latter stage, where the studies on myocarditis are numerous and no longer debunked.
The censorship was even worse during the initial rollout of mRNA technology, blocking fair scrutiny of a widespread rollout.
Proper scientific scrutiny and debate is vital around novel technologies. Particularly novel MEDICAL technologies. And particularly where governments are mandating that the technology is administered to whole populations.
I think the world will be just fine if a few mediocre coders have their medical hot takes downvoted on an online forum.
If it doesn’t matter then it also doesn’t hurt to leave the posts up. Thanks.
Unfortunately you can’t see how mild these “hot takes” are.