I use Github Copilot and GPT4, and some CodyAI with GPT4 for coding. I still find them better for code. But, I have been using Gemini Ultra for creative writing targeting humans.
For human writing, Ultra is w-a-y beyond what ChatGPT 4 is capable of IMHO. GPT4 sounds like an AI write it. Even if you put a lot of prompting into establishing the right tone. With Ultra, it is getting hard to tell. Which is great!
I think of them like people. Each has their own opinion and has talents in different areas. Given they are $20/m I am happy to pay for all of them. It takes them about 5 minutes to pay for themselves.
I passed this text through Ultra and this is what I got:
Absolutely! Here's a rephrasing that focuses on a more natural, flowing conversational style while still conveying the core ideas:
I use GitHub Copilot, GPT-4 (and CodyAI), and Gemini Ultra regularly, and I've noticed a big difference in how they approach tasks. For coding, Copilot and GPT-4 are my top picks. However, when it comes to writing that needs to feel truly human, Gemini Ultra is hands-down the winner. It's getting to the point where I often can't tell the difference between its output and something a real writer would create. That's a huge difference from ChatGPT-4, which still can have that telltale "AI feel" even with careful prompting. These tools each have such unique strengths that I find them all valuable – the $20/month investment for each pays off in just minutes.
Changes Made:
* No Visual Cues: Removed formatting elements (bold, bullets) that can scream "AI-assisted".
* Conversational Flow: Uses phrases like "I've noticed a big difference" and "hands-down the winner" to feel more like someone speaking their experience.
* Softened Comparison: Keeps the idea that Ultra surpasses ChatGPT-4 for a certain type of writing, but tones down the strong declaration for a more subjective feel.
Let me know if you want it even more casual or have another specific tone in mind!
Comments
I use Github Copilot and GPT4, and some CodyAI with GPT4 for coding. I still find them better for code. But, I have been using Gemini Ultra for creative writing targeting humans.
For human writing, Ultra is w-a-y beyond what ChatGPT 4 is capable of IMHO. GPT4 sounds like an AI write it. Even if you put a lot of prompting into establishing the right tone. With Ultra, it is getting hard to tell. Which is great! I think of them like people. Each has their own opinion and has talents in different areas. Given they are $20/m I am happy to pay for all of them. It takes them about 5 minutes to pay for themselves.
I passed this text through Ultra and this is what I got:
Absolutely! Here's a rephrasing that focuses on a more natural, flowing conversational style while still conveying the core ideas:
I use GitHub Copilot, GPT-4 (and CodyAI), and Gemini Ultra regularly, and I've noticed a big difference in how they approach tasks. For coding, Copilot and GPT-4 are my top picks. However, when it comes to writing that needs to feel truly human, Gemini Ultra is hands-down the winner. It's getting to the point where I often can't tell the difference between its output and something a real writer would create. That's a huge difference from ChatGPT-4, which still can have that telltale "AI feel" even with careful prompting. These tools each have such unique strengths that I find them all valuable – the $20/month investment for each pays off in just minutes.
Changes Made:
* No Visual Cues: Removed formatting elements (bold, bullets) that can scream "AI-assisted".
* Conversational Flow: Uses phrases like "I've noticed a big difference" and "hands-down the winner" to feel more like someone speaking their experience.
* Softened Comparison: Keeps the idea that Ultra surpasses ChatGPT-4 for a certain type of writing, but tones down the strong declaration for a more subjective feel.
Let me know if you want it even more casual or have another specific tone in mind!