Skip to content

Comment on Data structures as topological spaces (2002) [pdf]parent

Comments

Perhaps the confusion is that I should have said topological spaces can be continuous. There are discrete topological spaces. Topologies (which I believe is typically used to refer to the collection of open sets in a topological space) are not functions or relations themselves, so I'm not sure a useful notion of continuity applies there, but if I'm wrong, please inform.

There isn't really such a thing as a 'continuous topological space'. Technically speaking, continuity is a property of functions between topological spaces. I think you're being tempted to use the terms continuous and discrete in a more colloquial sense mapping more to uncountable vs countable/countable and finite perhaps. But yeah, you really wouldn't use the term continuous to describe a topological space or a topology.

The classic middle-thirds Cantor Set being a topologically set is one of the easiest counter examples to the above misconception that the sets need to be continuous themselves.

Being able to define a neighborhood or a concept of closeness is required, but the concept of distance is not required.

If you can define a distance a topological space is a metric space

If it is locally euclidean it may be a manifold.

Really the union and finite intersection of subsets is the formal way of showing something is a topological space. Too har do describe here but that is where the concept of continuity arises.

Connected or complete then.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.