If liberals sought to deny rights for others while keeping them for themselves, they'd be hypocritical. Preferring not to use them is not hypocritical. I am all for accommodations for the mobility-challenged, while preferring not to be mobility-challenged. Is that hypocritical?
For hetero parents, they probably prefer that their children are hetero as well. But if their children are homosexual, the parents would still prefer their children are happy, can raise children, and enjoy full social benefits. What is hypocritical about that?
Probably most parents would prefer that their children marry within their own race. Yet they'd also not rather that anyone be denied the ability to marry someone of a different race as well.
Comments
If liberals sought to deny rights for others while keeping them for themselves, they'd be hypocritical. Preferring not to use them is not hypocritical. I am all for accommodations for the mobility-challenged, while preferring not to be mobility-challenged. Is that hypocritical?
For hetero parents, they probably prefer that their children are hetero as well. But if their children are homosexual, the parents would still prefer their children are happy, can raise children, and enjoy full social benefits. What is hypocritical about that?
Probably most parents would prefer that their children marry within their own race. Yet they'd also not rather that anyone be denied the ability to marry someone of a different race as well.