Why don't you publish the top 3 or 5 folks who up vote and down vote the most, maybe as an additional section on the leaders page. It might effect behavior interestingly.
I thought it was the other way around: never try to solve a social problem with software.
The karma-neutral idea sounds like a good one, but then you remember that it's easy to create new accounts... Ultimately, you just have to depend on people to do good or leave.
Comments
Why don't you publish the top 3 or 5 folks who up vote and down vote the most, maybe as an additional section on the leaders page. It might effect behavior interestingly.
I'd rather just make the system quietly do the right thing. Never do through social pressure what you could do through software.
I thought it was the other way around: never try to solve a social problem with software.
The karma-neutral idea sounds like a good one, but then you remember that it's easy to create new accounts... Ultimately, you just have to depend on people to do good or leave.
A fair point, but there is a downvote threshold (20 points). Easy to overcome, but also easy to detect.
I understand. I hope news.yc doesn't become an overly serious place though.
PS: As an after-thought, social pressure may be more adaptable than software.