I still stand by the comment I wrote 135 days ago in the second topic you cited above.
AWS is a good way to add or expand capacity to an existing "static" server. Last time I looked at the pricing, for a moderate volume site, AWS is more expensive than a comparable semi-shared sort of server arrangement.
Comments
I still stand by the comment I wrote 135 days ago in the second topic you cited above.
AWS is a good way to add or expand capacity to an existing "static" server. Last time I looked at the pricing, for a moderate volume site, AWS is more expensive than a comparable semi-shared sort of server arrangement.