Hmmm....couldn't you argue it the other way as well? I mean, a hallucination isn't just an incomplete fact present in the input set--it is a claim which wasn't in the input set.
That's not what we'd expect from a lossy compressor; we would expect incomplete or missing answers, but we wouldn't expect it to give us claims which were not in the input set.
Comments
Hmmm....couldn't you argue it the other way as well? I mean, a hallucination isn't just an incomplete fact present in the input set--it is a claim which wasn't in the input set.
That's not what we'd expect from a lossy compressor; we would expect incomplete or missing answers, but we wouldn't expect it to give us claims which were not in the input set.