The amount of assumptions you stuffed into the reply is simply mind boggling.
I'll start by dispelling a simple one:
Better half doesn't necessarily equate to girlfriend.
Furthermore, the condescending tone and verbiage used in the reply is nothing more than inflammatory. I would disservice myself to continue responding past this point.
>Better half doesn't necessarily equate to girlfriend.
The original post was talking about girlfriends, so contextually it sounded like you meant girlfriend by "better half". You're a terrible spokesman for ending sexism as you seem to replace one form of ignorance for another combined with hypersensitivity (having said that, yes the original "joke" was a lame one).
Comments
The amount of assumptions you stuffed into the reply is simply mind boggling.
I'll start by dispelling a simple one:
Better half doesn't necessarily equate to girlfriend.
Furthermore, the condescending tone and verbiage used in the reply is nothing more than inflammatory. I would disservice myself to continue responding past this point.
>Better half doesn't necessarily equate to girlfriend.
The original post was talking about girlfriends, so contextually it sounded like you meant girlfriend by "better half". You're a terrible spokesman for ending sexism as you seem to replace one form of ignorance for another combined with hypersensitivity (having said that, yes the original "joke" was a lame one).