If MitM attacks are so rare, why bother encrypting your traffic in the first place? Packet-snooping attacks are also "extremely rare" by most metrics, so why protect against one but not the other?
Either go all the way on security, or be obvious about not having any. Appearing secure when in actuality you're not is the worst option.
'Packet-snooping attacks are also "extremely rare"'
I think they're pretty common, even for fun and recreation (http://codebutler.com/firesheep). I know I could start reading people's emails in Starbucks with what's on my laptop now and the knowledge in my head, but if I wanted to mount a MITM attack I would need to do some research.
Comments
If MitM attacks are so rare, why bother encrypting your traffic in the first place? Packet-snooping attacks are also "extremely rare" by most metrics, so why protect against one but not the other?
Either go all the way on security, or be obvious about not having any. Appearing secure when in actuality you're not is the worst option.
Packet-snooping attacks are also "extremely rare" by most metrics [...]
Really? NSA boxes in AT&T (and presumably other) switching stations suggest that for US traffic it's extremely common.
'Packet-snooping attacks are also "extremely rare"'
I think they're pretty common, even for fun and recreation (http://codebutler.com/firesheep). I know I could start reading people's emails in Starbucks with what's on my laptop now and the knowledge in my head, but if I wanted to mount a MITM attack I would need to do some research.