The data collection, which took place over three years, was legal because the information was not encrypted, the F.C.C. ultimately determined.
Interesting how this works. If I went wardriving and collected personal emails from unencrypted networks, I'd have my house rummaged by FBI agents, be hit with a 25,000-count felony wiretapping indictment and have some go-getter federal prosecutor try to convince a judge to sentence me to 7,000 years in prison. Then an appeals court might say reverse on the grounds that it was unencrypted. Maybe.
Google does it? A slap on the wrist and a small fine for "obstructing an investigation."
That's because the software Google used didn't actively browse the networks to look for documents, but passively intercepted and logged packets. If they wrote a program that actually searched the networks for shared folders and copied information that way, then conceivably they could be guilty of unauthorized computer access.
Comments
The data collection, which took place over three years, was legal because the information was not encrypted, the F.C.C. ultimately determined.
Interesting how this works. If I went wardriving and collected personal emails from unencrypted networks, I'd have my house rummaged by FBI agents, be hit with a 25,000-count felony wiretapping indictment and have some go-getter federal prosecutor try to convince a judge to sentence me to 7,000 years in prison. Then an appeals court might say reverse on the grounds that it was unencrypted. Maybe.
Google does it? A slap on the wrist and a small fine for "obstructing an investigation."
That's because the software Google used didn't actively browse the networks to look for documents, but passively intercepted and logged packets. If they wrote a program that actually searched the networks for shared folders and copied information that way, then conceivably they could be guilty of unauthorized computer access.
> That's because the software Google used didn't actively browse the networks to look for documents
Do we know that for a fact? Sorry if well known, genuine question.
When did you stop beating your wife? How do we know for a fact?
> When did you stop beating your wife? How do we know for a fact?
I never was accused of that. Silly response. Google has been accused of several privacy violations.
Why/how would the FBI be notified? Capturing packets from an unsecured wifi network doesn't exactly ring alarm bells.
I hate to be that guy, but do you have any examples? I thought war driving was a very murky gray area of the law.
Has anyone actually been prosecuted for simply passively monitoring unsecured WiFi networks?
Legal in what country?