Skip to content

Comment on The Open Source Sustainability Crisisparent

Comments

The solution to open-source sustainability is straightforward: people pay for what they genuinely need. Commercial open-source excels in this aspect!

I define this in the post as "Open Source subsidization, not sustainability."

https://openpath.chadwhitacre.com/2024/the-open-source-susta...

It's fine as far as it goes, but it doesn't go far enough. It works for products, but it doesn't work well for libraries, frameworks, dev tools, and the like.

donating is incredibly convenient nowadays

It's convenient to get started but not to scale. I run one of the foremost corporate Open Source donation programs (imo, obv):

https://blog.sentry.io/we-just-gave-500-000-dollars-to-open-...

GitHub Sponsors is very difficult to use at scale (100s or 1000s of deps). Thanks.dev is better but still has a lot of room to grow.

addressing the root of the issue

Open Source is a common pool resource, and these are funded through collective social pressure, the limit case of which is taxation. More on this in a future post.

It works for products, but it doesn't work well for libraries, frameworks, dev tools, and the like.

That is why we need to create an open-source ecosystem where projects that get paid redistribute to their dependencies. I have in mind 2 OSS ecosystems: open-source-economy.com and tea.xyz

This blog article, for example, explains how a bounty system could be beneficial for the whole ecosystem: https://www.open-source-economy.com/blog/make-open-source-fi...

I would be very curious to hear what you are thinking about those two projects. Spoiler: they are both in the early stage - and both use blockchain.

More on this in a future post. Happy to read more about your vision!
AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.