I'm speculating they are attempting to avoid controversy about their datasources. That and a possible competitive edge depending on what specific sets/filtering they're using.
It’s common for third party model testers to not disclose what they mean by “Refusal” parameter as well, for obvious reasons. The world is full of witch-hunting maniacs now and will stay so for an indefinite amount of time. Just wait until the whole thing becomes more widely known and they realize. All AI companies have to hurry up before the doors shut.
Comments
I'm speculating they are attempting to avoid controversy about their datasources. That and a possible competitive edge depending on what specific sets/filtering they're using.
To avoid controversy AND potential lawsuits.
Yup.
I think many countries (japan already has) will allow IP for training data.
They just need to buy time until then.
It’s common for third party model testers to not disclose what they mean by “Refusal” parameter as well, for obvious reasons. The world is full of witch-hunting maniacs now and will stay so for an indefinite amount of time. Just wait until the whole thing becomes more widely known and they realize. All AI companies have to hurry up before the doors shut.