Yes that would make sense. I'm in no way arguing that models can't be more open, just that overloading a commonly used expression such as "open-source" and then complaining that projects are not complying with your new definition of open-source just does not make sense to me.
Comments
Then what we need isn't open source. It's something else. Maybe called "Open Model?"
Yes that would make sense. I'm in no way arguing that models can't be more open, just that overloading a commonly used expression such as "open-source" and then complaining that projects are not complying with your new definition of open-source just does not make sense to me.