> Rolling back that 2004 ODA program to the DER structure would be the rational response at this point.
What's the rationale, again?
I'm not seeing any root cause analysis or justification in your text that reverting to a (still conflicted) secondee concept would prevent similar outcomes.
Comments
> Rolling back that 2004 ODA program to the DER structure would be the rational response at this point.
What's the rationale, again?
I'm not seeing any root cause analysis or justification in your text that reverting to a (still conflicted) secondee concept would prevent similar outcomes.
The rationale is that Boeing got an exception from best practices, so they should revert to best practices.
Respectfully, you're repeating the parent and not addressing my question.
What "best practice" from before, albeit which had a secondee structure, would've caught this malfunction?