Skip to content

Comment on What's Gone Wrong at Boeingparent

Comments

evidence of how good planes

How good other planes are. The MAX record is abysmal. https://www.airsafe.com/events/models/rate_mod.htm

So, there is one single model of airplane being manufactured that reaches 10% of the Max kill-rate, and it's a quite old one.

One model, representing a nearly infinitesimally small percentage number of miles for Boeing. I'm not an expert, but my understanding is the 737MAX tried to do some relatively innovative things that backfired. And that product is now just as bad in terms of safety as the average plane was 30 years ago (but many times more efficient).

It is far from a condemnation of Boeing and capitalism that one of their more innovative products is suffering some setbacks, and those setbacks amount to it being as unsafe as the average plane 30 years ago. Think about that: in 1970 the average flight was 2x worse, and still people chose to accept that risk voluntarily. Today, that level of risk just means Boeing will try to refine the product.

Failures of "-isms" are when millions starve in famines--not when a new product suffered a pushed back timeline for being a relatively unsafe compared to other contemporaneous models.

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/fatal-airliner-accidents-...

People used to take more risk, so everything fine? Refine the product after innovation, so everything is fine? What corporate double think is this?

Failures of "-isms"

And that's a very weird diversion, since this isn't about any ideology, but go ahead, travel by MAX 8.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.