There was a lot more of that hazardous carcinogenic stuff 50 years ago though. Baby cribs used to be made from asbestos. Every other person was a smoker. Houses were painted with lead. This trend is very very recent.
there would be a clear geographic distribution of cancers along major highways vs rural areas with little traffic
which may be happening? not sure if anyone actually tried making a survey along those lines yet; I think currently most of the time a geographic distrubution of cancers is assessed to find chemical leaks e.g. superfund sites
Comments
They’re baffled? Look around. We are swimming in artificially synthesized chemicals. What so hard to understand?
There was a lot more of that hazardous carcinogenic stuff 50 years ago though. Baby cribs used to be made from asbestos. Every other person was a smoker. Houses were painted with lead. This trend is very very recent.
Maybe car tires dust then?
there would be a clear geographic distribution of cancers along major highways vs rural areas with little traffic
which may be happening? not sure if anyone actually tried making a survey along those lines yet; I think currently most of the time a geographic distrubution of cancers is assessed to find chemical leaks e.g. superfund sites
Why people still make the appeal to nature fallacy, for starters.
I wouldnt trust my life with doctors, they are no better than religious academics.
The drug companies know more than them!
Were the crazies saying 5G causes cancer right after all?