Skip to content

Comment on RSS will never dieparent

Comments

> What the world needs, I think, is a paid social media aggregator. If people are going to pay for a newspaper subscription, couldn't you get people to pay for something that makes the web easier to follow?

There are already a number of these: different planet* aggregators for technologies, longreads for "longer pieces", etc...

A single aggregator? The world does not need it, because it's absolutely worthless and makes little to no sense. I probably don't want to read what you want to, and neither does the next guy.

> If people are going to pay for a newspaper subscription

There's a reason why newspaper are dying: by and large, people are not going to pay for a newspaper subscription.

I definitely agree that personalization is the key - but on an individual basis.

That is the focus of our company - and why we feel RSS won't die - but its role will evolve as more info is consumed via Twitter/ etc/ etc - ignoring the social signs(data) readers/ users provide doesn't make much sense.

But personalization should always be an option - because the firehose is still very useful

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.