The way this is said makes it seem like they're expecting to be paid twice for two orders, one returned.
I assume what's being left implicit is that they're actually not paid for the 'KDP printing order' if it ends up returned? So then when someone else orders and receives that one and doesn't return it, there's a printed copy that was never paid out for?
Hm. I'm not logged in, and I only see 2 tweets, neither of which discuss royalties. What I'm seeing is only concerned with the poor customer experience of receiving damaged goods.
Comments
The way this is said makes it seem like they're expecting to be paid twice for two orders, one returned.
I assume what's being left implicit is that they're actually not paid for the 'KDP printing order' if it ends up returned? So then when someone else orders and receives that one and doesn't return it, there's a printed copy that was never paid out for?
Are you referring to the Dec 30 tweet text, the Dec 28 tweet text, or the paper note in the Dec 28 tweet's photo?
Yes. The four tweets (not counting one from someone else) and photo of the note that I can see without clicking 'show more replies' and logging in.
Hm. I'm not logged in, and I only see 2 tweets, neither of which discuss royalties. What I'm seeing is only concerned with the poor customer experience of receiving damaged goods.