Comment on Time is encoded in the weights of finetuned language modelsparentComments−fnordpiglet2yI don’t have a twitter account, and many don’t. Twitter is slow, nitter is fast. Twitter has never reliably displayed threads for me. Nitter does.−newZWhoDis2yTwitter is slowIt’s faster than it’s ever been, and seemingly without 85% of its staff. Says a lot−fnordpiglet2yAnd yet nitter is still faster with only 47 contributors total. Says more.−bobmaxup2y... because it is essentially a caching proxy to twitter?−Zambyte2ySo is twitter.com. Unless they aren't using a CDN lol−schaefer2yI think the advertiser boycott is a major contributor. Advertisements are slow...−pests2yX's reduced user base might make X faster than ever.−thulle2ySome data for me:Nitter: I get all 8 posts in the thread in 18 requests, 207 kB, 169 kB transferred.X: I only get the first post, 128 requests, 11.45 MB, 2.11 MB transferred.−calamari40652yNo, no it is not.−KTibow2yTwitter requires JS to work though.
Comments
I don’t have a twitter account, and many don’t. Twitter is slow, nitter is fast. Twitter has never reliably displayed threads for me. Nitter does.
It’s faster than it’s ever been, and seemingly without 85% of its staff. Says a lot
And yet nitter is still faster with only 47 contributors total. Says more.
... because it is essentially a caching proxy to twitter?
So is twitter.com. Unless they aren't using a CDN lol
I think the advertiser boycott is a major contributor. Advertisements are slow...
X's reduced user base might make X faster than ever.
Some data for me:
Nitter: I get all 8 posts in the thread in 18 requests, 207 kB, 169 kB transferred.
X: I only get the first post, 128 requests, 11.45 MB, 2.11 MB transferred.
No, no it is not.
Twitter requires JS to work though.