I actually find this article rather unfair to all involved. It is quite clear that the author seems to have it out for AH - after all, a $100m return is freaking AMAZING for $250,000, and Benchmark made a far lower multiple for the amount they invested.
In the end, I'd say the win goes to AH - they made a mistake, but also didn't exactly lose either.
Comments
I actually find this article rather unfair to all involved. It is quite clear that the author seems to have it out for AH - after all, a $100m return is freaking AMAZING for $250,000, and Benchmark made a far lower multiple for the amount they invested.
In the end, I'd say the win goes to AH - they made a mistake, but also didn't exactly lose either.