Skip to content

Comment on It's time for developers and enterprises to build with Gemini Pro

Comments

It is difficult to use Gemini because they don't seem to have a public equivalent to chat.openai.com yet. But there is https://bard.google.com but I can't verify the model used.

Either way, I uploaded this picture from the Gemini example prompt library to both Bard and GPT4 and asked "How much does each item cost?". Bard showed me a map of Bali and GPT4 got every item correct.

https://imgur.com/a/mymY23g (my test)

Not sure if Bard is using Gemini yet, but them going around hyping up Gemini without a working public prototype seems like a fail on the statement "you only get one chance to make a first impression".

ChatGPT spread by word of mouth from people using it. Google is taking the opposite approach it seems.

I uploaded this picture from the Gemini example prompt library to both Bard and GPT4 and asked "How much does each item cost?". Bard showed me a map of Bali

That’s actually hilarious and would fit perfectly in a Silicon Valley episode.

Isn't the deal with this post about the "Google AI Studio" they released today? It's different than Bard. Also, I don't see the point in comparing Gemini Pro to GPT-4, since Google's own paper describes it as only slightly better than GPT 3.5.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.