Skip to content

Comment on Clairvoyant Remote Viewing: The US Sponsored Psychic Spyingparent

Comments

You are suggesting I read more subjective comments to disprove my own subjective comment?

Which comment specifically should I read to have a better informed view of the particular study I recalled here?

I closed the book on remote viewing decades ago as it’s not something I can personally replicate but will still entertain the conversation and argue for either side until it is conclusive.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.