I'll refine it. I scraped a lot of sites and some of them were terrible. I just figured it was better to have the data there and let users decide as opposed to not having anything. I can see scraping some numbers related to traffic and using that for ranking.
Comments
The first 10 are variants of “this one is dead” or “costs $19 otherwise useless”
Maybe a curated list is more useful?
I'll refine it. I scraped a lot of sites and some of them were terrible. I just figured it was better to have the data there and let users decide as opposed to not having anything. I can see scraping some numbers related to traffic and using that for ranking.
Need refinement but a good start! It'd be useful and I just bookmarked it :)
I've got to agree. A bulk, uncurated, unoptimised for effectiveness list is not particularly useful.