There is very little context but, in my opinion, you can't be a "solo *tech* founder" without some technical skill. You can improvise a sales or marketing person for some time, but no way you could improvise a devops or security engineer. You need a "CTO" otherwise you will fail, 99.9% guaranteed.
Your cofounder doesn't need to own 50% of the shares, you can still act like a "solo-preneur" but you need people fully committed to the success of your adventure.
Comments
My guess is that you need a co-founder that can fill the gap instead of employees.
Then he won't be a solo-preneur anymore.
It seems like hiring people is much less risky than marrying them.
There is very little context but, in my opinion, you can't be a "solo *tech* founder" without some technical skill. You can improvise a sales or marketing person for some time, but no way you could improvise a devops or security engineer. You need a "CTO" otherwise you will fail, 99.9% guaranteed.
Your cofounder doesn't need to own 50% of the shares, you can still act like a "solo-preneur" but you need people fully committed to the success of your adventure.