Comment on Protecting customers with generative AI indemnificationparentComments−_ahxg2yI'm pretty sure now that the debate of AI ownership is a foregone conclusion - nobody owns AI outputs.but at the same time, they put ToS that you may not train a new LLM using the output of their LLM...−DWLooney2yClassic case of wanting their cake and eating it too. Although I don't think they'll be surprised if their TOS doesn't hold up in court either.−janosdebugs2yIANAL, but I believe that wouldn't just be simple copyright infringement, but a breach of contract.−anon3738392yThe workaround is to use an intermediary so that you don’t have any contractual obligations to breach, and the intermediary stays far away from your downstream use, so they never breached the agreement either.
Comments
but at the same time, they put ToS that you may not train a new LLM using the output of their LLM...
Classic case of wanting their cake and eating it too. Although I don't think they'll be surprised if their TOS doesn't hold up in court either.
IANAL, but I believe that wouldn't just be simple copyright infringement, but a breach of contract.
The workaround is to use an intermediary so that you don’t have any contractual obligations to breach, and the intermediary stays far away from your downstream use, so they never breached the agreement either.