Skip to content

Comment on Semantic Versioning 2.0 (2013)parent

Comments

You arguments here and in another comment support my view actually, although shaped as if they were opposing it.

Tells me the maintainer is wishy washy and gives 0 hoots about stability.

Maybe the maintainer have read the famous engineering best practice manifesto SemVer, and rests assured that increased major version number allows him to introduce incompatible changes safely?

Well, it is safe Just not good for users.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.