That sounds good to me, I'd rather pay $$$$+$ than $$$$+$$$ for the 400GB of NetFlix traffic and 100GB of other traffic I use per month.
Sorry, but that's a shortsighted view. You're now glad that you only pay +$, but a year from now you could be paying +$/4 if only the competition hadn't been crushed by these deals.
Comments
That sounds good to me, I'd rather pay $$$$+$ than $$$$+$$$ for the 400GB of NetFlix traffic and 100GB of other traffic I use per month.
Sorry, but that's a shortsighted view. You're now glad that you only pay +$, but a year from now you could be paying +$/4 if only the competition hadn't been crushed by these deals.
>competition hadn't been crushed by these deals.
I assume you mean NetFlix's competition.
I can see your point there. In a perfect world, as a consumer I would have a choice of ISPs. I wonder if this will become an antitrust issue:
http://www.nytimes.com/2000/08/06/business/how-coke-pushed-r...