You’re missing the point entirely. I said I wouldn’t call them that, and the reasoning behind that is the important part. Get your head out of the pedantic sand.
My point is that mjevans's proposal would not work.
You jumped in with a personal opinion about one word choice, in what I believe is a tangential point making a jab at the union.
That personal opinion on the matter shouldn't carry much weight as 1) many others refer to it as "concession", 2) using GM's term of "sacrifice" doesn't affect the logic behind my point, 3) you haven't explained your reasoning, making it hard for me to understand how it has anything to do with my point.
Comments
You’re missing the point entirely. I said I wouldn’t call them that, and the reasoning behind that is the important part. Get your head out of the pedantic sand.
No wonder you don’t understand.
My point is that mjevans's proposal would not work.
You jumped in with a personal opinion about one word choice, in what I believe is a tangential point making a jab at the union.
That personal opinion on the matter shouldn't carry much weight as 1) many others refer to it as "concession", 2) using GM's term of "sacrifice" doesn't affect the logic behind my point, 3) you haven't explained your reasoning, making it hard for me to understand how it has anything to do with my point.