Last worked in EJBs in 2002. There’s still a bad taste in my mouth.
Although EJBs got improved so much in 2006 it was nearly a different technology, EJBs by themselves have been largely deemphasized in Jakarta EE. The main bean model is CDI and has been for some time.
By my earlier statement I meant that the old JavaEE application servers with standalone EJBs deployed as ejb-jars and JMS were good infrastructure while now JavaEE tries to become the next SpringBoot.
In .Net I would prefer to have application servers instead of an operating system performing the same function. Blazor is nicer to use than JSF and Entity Framework than JPA.
Comments
Although EJBs got improved so much in 2006 it was nearly a different technology, EJBs by themselves have been largely deemphasized in Jakarta EE. The main bean model is CDI and has been for some time.
By my earlier statement I meant that the old JavaEE application servers with standalone EJBs deployed as ejb-jars and JMS were good infrastructure while now JavaEE tries to become the next SpringBoot. In .Net I would prefer to have application servers instead of an operating system performing the same function. Blazor is nicer to use than JSF and Entity Framework than JPA.
Because it's tries to follow trends. The tech is not driving sales guys, they are driving the tech.