Skip to content

Comment on Compiling Rust for .NET, using only tea and stubbornnessparent

Comments

As much as I like C#, every time I'm on the job market, I end up taking a job in C#.

Rust's biggest advantage over C# is that it's framework-free. IE, you compile a working executable; nothing more is required.

What's harder to understand is: Will I be more productive using Rust compared to C#? (After dealing with the learning curve.) Will my code be "faster enough" to lower the cost of operations? (IE, a cluster of 5 servers instead of 15?)

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.