I stand behind the statements I made and went to the trouble to provide you with an easily checked example, but it seems you ignored it completely? Did you overlook the archive.org link?
I too read Zens stating there are millions in reeducation camps.
I was asking you how many fighters you think there were. If you believe that everyone arrested was a fighter, and also Zenz' claim that millions were arrested, that implies you think there were millions of fighters. On the other hand, it doesn't seem like you believe him, so you probably think the number of fighters is less. So how many were there?
But my point was that you don't have to believe Zenz, you can just skim his writing for links to citations and read those instead.
You're using circular logic.
Where is the cycle in my reasoning?
What group of researchers? If there's so many, you shouldn't have trouble naming someone besides Zens.
If you read the article I linked, you wouldn't have trouble finding the list of names at the end: Renee Xia, Victor Clemens, Frances Eve
Comments
I stand behind the statements I made and went to the trouble to provide you with an easily checked example, but it seems you ignored it completely? Did you overlook the archive.org link?
I was asking you how many fighters you think there were. If you believe that everyone arrested was a fighter, and also Zenz' claim that millions were arrested, that implies you think there were millions of fighters. On the other hand, it doesn't seem like you believe him, so you probably think the number of fighters is less. So how many were there?
But my point was that you don't have to believe Zenz, you can just skim his writing for links to citations and read those instead.
Where is the cycle in my reasoning?
If you read the article I linked, you wouldn't have trouble finding the list of names at the end: Renee Xia, Victor Clemens, Frances Eve