Skip to content

Comment on My Books Were Used to Train AIparent

Comments

AI lowered the barrier to entry of just generating a large body of text and self-publishing

Honestly, most of the generated stuff I've seen at length (as in, more than 1 or 2 page lengths of content) just devolves to gibberish. The words and sentences are syntactically correct, but mostly irrelevant or meaningless in the context of the story as a whole. It's like reading a collage of stories jammed together with no real artistry.

You can self publish that (people do) but it's not really much improved on the old scam of just publishing copy-pasta bullshit.

I think there can be space for LLMs to do things here, but right now they are absolutely not a replacement for an author with a story they want to tell.

They are more like a calculator: If you have a clear picture of a scene/character/setting, the LLM can flesh out a lot of options for you to pick and choose from to best match your intent. It does mundane work in support of your goal - it has no goal itself.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.