So this is basically just what we used to do in IBM Extended ASCII like thirty-five (forty?) years ago, only slightly expanded because Unicode has more characters than Codepage... Uh, 472? 185? I forget. But anyway, wow: So much time, so little progress.
Comments
So this is basically just what we used to do in IBM Extended ASCII like thirty-five (forty?) years ago, only slightly expanded because Unicode has more characters than Codepage... Uh, 472? 185? I forget. But anyway, wow: So much time, so little progress.