Skip to content

Comment on Paul Graham calls A.I. ‘the exact opposite of a solution in search of a problem’parent

Comments

I wish people would just do some deeper investigation before forming opinions based on their biases. If you actually use it you know it's incredibly useful for learning, getting answers to general problems that 99% of the time work fine and it helps you understand those answers.

I actually use it and I find that that 99% is ridiculously high.

The amount of times it's wrong or misleading is not significant enough to even be annoying during day to day use

There may be use cases where it isn’t wrong a lot, or you may jave a high tolerance before annoyance hits, or you may be failing to detect it being wrong, but that certainly doesn’t match my experience.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.