Skip to content

Comment on Understanding American Airport Security Following 9/11 (2019)parent

Comments

It's important to remember that bombs are only ever dangerous on planes, and nobody would ever think of detonating a bomb in a packed security queue.

The kind of bombs an amateur can put together will probably do a lot less damage in an airport queue than on a 777. Seriously damage an airliner and like as not you can kill everyone on board, whereas the same bomb in even a busy public space will probably only kill a few dozen people at best (body blocking, etc).

Strictly talking from the perspective of inflicting maximal harm - That need not be the goal of a would-be bomber.

Five to six large suitcases filled with explosives would likely do a lot of damage, and I saw several of them being wheeled by a single adult in or near the packed queue, as the queue spilled into the common areas.

And while it might be less casualties in terms of bodies than a large plane, I think it would be more effective in terms of terror as there would be much more people directly affected.

Imagine what it'd do to all those waiting in the check-in queues when they experience the explosion and the aftermath.

That's why it scared me so much. It would have been such an effective move, requiring little skill and few actors.

I've never been scared of such acts before or since.

I think the goal is instilling fear, and honestly, making you fear crowds would be a terribly effective strategy.

Places that take terrorism threats seriously have multiple checkpoints spread out everywhere for that reason.

Not only large queues are an ideal spot to bomb if the goal is to make a lot of victims, but not having a well defined location for security checks makes it more difficult for terrorists to plan around.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.