I'm not so sure that you could replicate eBay (or Digg) with four people. I do agree that it's harder to maintain culture as you get bigger - but that's the whole point of management.
We're trying to build a tiny little mini-eBay in a tiny little niche market, and it's taking us fucking forever to do stuff. The issue is that it's really hard to determine what's essential - and to get a new seller (and we don't ask people to leave eBay; we just want them to add Dawdle as a venue), we have to be better than eBay on all those things that particular user feels is essential.
That's why Mixx, despite being a nicer community, with all sorts of bells and whistles, and links on lots of major sites, isn't taking off (http://siteanalytics.compete.com/mixx.com+digg.com/?metric=u...). There's a certain je ne sais quoi about a site that determines what makes it "essential" - and it usually isn't feature equivalence.
It's hard to filter things to their essential features, but that ability is kind of what defines a good entrepreneur.
Building those essential things-- those things people absolutely need to use your service (and maybe to differentiate it)-- and then iterating upwards is the key. In six months, I think you could replicate the majority of eBay's functionality with four people.
The things you're discussing are mostly user acquisition problems. That problem is not solved by hiring more engineers.
Comments
I'm not so sure that you could replicate eBay (or Digg) with four people. I do agree that it's harder to maintain culture as you get bigger - but that's the whole point of management.
We're trying to build a tiny little mini-eBay in a tiny little niche market, and it's taking us fucking forever to do stuff. The issue is that it's really hard to determine what's essential - and to get a new seller (and we don't ask people to leave eBay; we just want them to add Dawdle as a venue), we have to be better than eBay on all those things that particular user feels is essential.
That's why Mixx, despite being a nicer community, with all sorts of bells and whistles, and links on lots of major sites, isn't taking off (http://siteanalytics.compete.com/mixx.com+digg.com/?metric=u...). There's a certain je ne sais quoi about a site that determines what makes it "essential" - and it usually isn't feature equivalence.
It's hard to filter things to their essential features, but that ability is kind of what defines a good entrepreneur.
Building those essential things-- those things people absolutely need to use your service (and maybe to differentiate it)-- and then iterating upwards is the key. In six months, I think you could replicate the majority of eBay's functionality with four people.
The things you're discussing are mostly user acquisition problems. That problem is not solved by hiring more engineers.