That's the point of this document. To enumerate types actions which are:
* 100% valid and necessary in some contexts (this is your point IIUC)
* ...but can nevertheless be used for organizational sabotage if overdone on purpose (point of the article)
* ...and lead to Dilbert hell if done because of bad incentives (the reason why this article keeps being so popular among office workers)
Comments
That's the point of this document. To enumerate types actions which are:
by Dilbert hell do you mean Kafkaesque office politics? or is there like a specific kind of Dilbert hell?
The office reality presented in Dilbert is hell on earth. There are some references to hell in Dilbert but I don't think they are very specific.