> A comment on HN is going to be mature and reasoned; often expanding or exploring technical issues raised
That's what I love about HN : the content of comments here are of a very high quality.
It's something that I've noticed with my own posts - well reasoned comments attract a lot of positive karma. Even if you're taking a controversial stance on an issue.
At least 50% of the time I don't even read the article, I just read the comments. I tend to be more interested in the conversation the posts generate than the posts themselves.
I would venture to guess I read the comments 90% more than the actual posts. The discussion (or the subject) will occasionally lead me to read the article in depth, but more often than not the discourse here is more enlightening overall. I can easily say HN is the only community where my behavior follows this model.
Comments
> A comment on HN is going to be mature and reasoned; often expanding or exploring technical issues raised
That's what I love about HN : the content of comments here are of a very high quality.
It's something that I've noticed with my own posts - well reasoned comments attract a lot of positive karma. Even if you're taking a controversial stance on an issue.
At least 50% of the time I don't even read the article, I just read the comments. I tend to be more interested in the conversation the posts generate than the posts themselves.
I would venture to guess I read the comments 90% more than the actual posts. The discussion (or the subject) will occasionally lead me to read the article in depth, but more often than not the discourse here is more enlightening overall. I can easily say HN is the only community where my behavior follows this model.
90% is actually a more realistic metric for myself as well. I was being generous leaving it at "over 50%"....
This is true. Historically, I've gotten the most points on posts I posted expecting massive downvotes on due to their controversial nature.