Skip to content

Comment on ServiceNow Insecure Access Control to Full Admin Takeoverparent

Comments

Something I've been mulling over for a while: security vulnerabilities are basically the original developers getting outsmarted, caught out being careless. Even a very skilled, careful team might ship bugs that have security implications. But low-skilled, careless teams are definitely doing this. All buggy software is also vulnerable. There is no such thing as low-quality but secure.

security vulnerabilities are basically the original developers getting outsmarted, caught out being careless

This is absolutely not true. Security vulnerabilities can be due to a huge variety of reasons well beyond "the developer is outsmarted/careless". A great example of this was unicode related issues. Also, changing API/ABI surfaces.

And, we think of security vulnerabilities as "bugs" that cause "hacks", but sometimes vulnerabilities come in the form not in a technical hack, but attacks on users.

Sometimes, the developers know there's an issue, but the business forces them ahead anyways and takes on the risk. I've dealt with a few of those.

It's counterproductive to put it firmly on the developers, but I do agree that technical security issues and quality issues are tightly intertwined.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.